The
evaluation of an infant with febrile illness and no obvious focus of infection
is one of the main challenging job that faces pediatricians. The general
condition of the infant can generally be deceptive, and is labeled Serious
Bacterial Infection (SBI). Laboratory markers that have been used to predict
SBI include raised white blood cell (WBC) counts, C-reactive protein,
pro-calcitonin and even interleukin-6 levels. White blood cell count by itself,
does not compare well with relatively more recent markers such as C-reactive
protein and pro-calcitonin.
A
new study revises the relationship between reactive thrombocytosis among
febrile infants and assesses the utility of platelet count as a potential
predictor of serious bacterial infection in these patients.
The mean platelet count in
SBI infants was observed to be significantly higher than non-SBI infants.
Infections of the respiratory, urinary and gastrointestinal tracts, as well as
bones and meninges were the most common causes of reactive thrombocytosis. A platelet count of > 45,000/mL in addition to other laboratory data such as
WBC> 15,000 mL and CRP ≥2mg/dL was
a strong indicator of SBI.
The
study asserts the addition of a routine hematology parameter like platelet
count to the sepsis screen results in better differentiating between SBI and
non-SBI infants, which delineates the severity of the infection and the extent
of the treatment. This finding might be useful in the ER and in pediatrics where quick
turnaround time is necessary.
http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/content/17/1/6/F3.large.jpg
This is very interesting. I've never thought that a platelet count could indicate infections. Normally, we only associate the prescence of a high number of WBCs. I wonder how that relates to infections in adults? I'll be sure to pay more attention to that in lab.
ReplyDelete